[{"command":"settings","settings":{"pluralDelimiter":"\u0003","suppressDeprecationErrors":true,"ajaxPageState":{"libraries":"eJxLzi9K1U8pKi1IzNFLyUzMyU_XS8xKrAAAajEI0Q","theme":"rimap","theme_token":null},"ajaxTrustedUrl":[],"csp":{"nonce":"oWucZkGCT62Lc5E7SUYPag"},"user":{"uid":0,"permissionsHash":"aa71182581ac9d8b7fdf535efbd9231f2243f7dd74060a4c121bf6aa2541c2c5"}},"merge":true},{"command":"add_css","data":[{"rel":"stylesheet","media":"all","href":"\/sites\/default\/files\/css\/css_mC14btIbpvq2MlLlPcEiIIDwlT2D5Ahqs68qchaw-Ko.css?delta=0\u0026language=en\u0026theme=rimap\u0026include=eJxLzi9K1U8pKi1IzNFLzEqs0ElGEkjJTMzJTwcA8A8NXQ"}]},{"command":"add_js","selector":"body","data":[{"src":"\/sites\/default\/files\/js\/js_nNOCPZaYQr3UtoQvK7TKrDLq-pl2HrWIVsw0hc_h5CA.js?scope=footer\u0026delta=0\u0026language=en\u0026theme=rimap\u0026include=eJxLzi9K1U8pKi1IzNFLyUzMyU_XS8xKrAAAajEI0Q"}]},{"command":"openDialog","selector":"#drupal-modal","settings":null,"data":"\u003Ch5\u003EFair asylum procedures on appeal\u003C\/h5\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cp\u003EThe 1951 Refugee Convention does not prescribe standards for appeal procedures in State-led asylum systems. The core components of a fair and efficient appeal process can be derived from the right to an effective remedy under international human rights law as well as general principles of law and State practice. These core components have been elaborated in UNHCR guidance and ExCom Conclusions. These safeguards apply to all forms of review, regardless of the initial processing modality.\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EA fair asylum system requires that an appeal or review against a negative decision, including a negative admissibility decision, are handled by an authority, court or tribunal that is different from, and independent of the first-instance decision-making body. While ExCom Conclusion no. 8 requires a formal reconsideration by the same or a different authority, the independence of the appeal or review authority, court or tribunal ensures impartiality and strengthens due process. Fairness at the appeal stage includes clear procedures, decision-makers with the necessary legal expertise, and guarantees that applicants can effectively challenge negative decisions.\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003EKey elements that promote fairness on appeal include:\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cul\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022e38f9e63bd3daf0a1d287a03657bd9541\u0022\u003EIndependence from the first instance decision-making body\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022e42fb1b9785ba656b1d72519ea885f7a6\u0022\u003ERight of notice of the appeal process and timelines\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022ee7f397f175b170679305c4d7cae8921a\u0022\u003ERight to be heard, including through a personal interview \u0026nbsp;if (i) the negative decision at first instance was based on credibility findings that were not appropriately addressed during the interview or written assessment; (ii) evidence relevant to the determination of the claim presented by the asylum-seeker was not adequately considered at the first instance interview or in the written assessment; (iii) new evidence supporting the initial application is presented; (iv) procedural fairness was breached at the first instance (for example, because of inadequate interpretation, denial of opportunity to present supporting evidence, inappropriate questioning, confidentiality concerns, etc.);\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022eadce04da2ef785e336ed2527cdfd9f5d\u0022\u003ERight to a competent interpreter\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022e173619010e1f228a23b23c853ccba6f7\u0022\u003ERight to legal advice and representation (at own cost)\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022e04e3bc901ad6fe882e9f89e1d0f3f4ce\u0022\u003ERight to access case files and evidence\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022e495ec42af28a362b777bdbee3810f110\u0022\u003ERight to a written, reasoned decision\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022e6de459b05632c9f873ccebf5a5f91210\u0022\u003ERight to remain in the territory while the appeal is pending\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003C\/ul\u003E\u003Cp\u003EIn answering this question, please assess whether domestic laws and policies guarantee the abovementioned safeguards, specify the applicable provisions (e.g. article, section or paragraph), and provide a brief description of the provisions. In addition, analyze whether the laws and policies and their practical implementation:\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Cul\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022e2ab428182b604142f2ac78b112027809\u0022\u003EExplicitly guarantee these safeguards on appeal, and whether they are effectively implemented.\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022eea33440cab7d83cfd516a17dde8aedd9\u0022\u003EEstablish any conditions to have available any of the safeguards (for example fees or any other legal, administrative or practical requirements) and analyze whether any of these conditions may create barriers for asylum-seekers.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022e32aa2452e2218d742d4926a784b76541\u0022\u003EContain any provisions that may result in a difference in treatment among asylum-seekers, on any ground (for example nationality, age, gender and diversity etc.).\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003Cli data-list-item-id=\u0022ec5421b5f383d4222f3353daee310a363\u0022\u003EContain specific provisions for ensuring due process safeguards are meaningful for children and other vulnerable applicants, through accommodations and modifications, such as child-friendly procedures.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003C\/li\u003E\u003C\/ul\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E","dialogOptions":{"dialogClass":"question-guidance-popup","width":"50%","modal":true,"title":"Specific guidance to the question","classes":{"ui-dialog":"question-guidance-popup"}}}]