Tanzania’s domestic legal framework—under the Refugees Act No. 9 of 1998—does provide for the revocation or withdrawal of refugee status, particularly in cases where refugee status was fraudulently obtained, where the individual poses a threat to national security, or ceases to meet the criteria for refugee protection. These grounds broadly align with international standards, notably those outlined in Article 1F (exclusion clauses) and Article 1C (cessation clauses) of the 1951 Refugee Convention.

However, while the grounds for revocation or cancellation are generally consistent with international law, Tanzania’s domestic procedures lack key safeguards required under international standards. These include due process guarantees, such as the right to be informed of the grounds for revocation, the right to respond or contest the decision, access to legal representation, and the opportunity to appeal before an independent body. International standards—reflected in UNHCR guidelines—stress that cancellation or revocation should only occur following an individualized assessment, and that such actions must be proportionate, non-discriminatory, and subject to procedural fairness.

In Tanzania, the power to revoke refugee status is vested in the Minister for Home Affairs, with no express requirement for individualized hearings, legal representation, or external review. This places significant discretionary power in the hands of the executive, raising concerns about transparency, accountability, and protection from arbitrary decisions.